luceed_predmeti

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full behavioral burden but discloses only the resource. It does not state read-only status, permissions, whether actions are lookups or mutations, or return behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short fragments with the resource front-loaded. The action list is redundant with the schema enum, but there is no verbosity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple 3-parameter tool with full schema coverage and no output schema, the description is minimally viable: it identifies the resource and allowed actions. However, it omits action semantics and when to use this versus siblings, leaving gaps for an agent selecting among many luceed_* tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents uid, sifra, and action. The description merely repeats the action enum values and adds no meaning about which parameter each action expects or what the action returns.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Identifies the resource as CRM/case records ('Cases (predmeti)') and lists the three available actions. It does not differentiate this tool from similarly named CRM or lookup siblings like luceed_crm_razlozi, but the core purpose is clear.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to choose this tool over any sibling, or when to use each action. The action names are listed without conditions or alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.