luceed_catalog

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It does disclose the read-only nature of the listed resources and the intent of the Magento filter, but says nothing about the shape of the response, ordering, or size limits of the listing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tight sentences with no filler, and the scope statement is front-loaded ahead of the filter guidance. Slightly clipped phrasing costs it a point but nothing is wasted.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a no-output-schema, zero-required-parameter discovery tool, the description is minimally adequate. It gestures at the returned content ('resources/actions/paths') but does not describe the listing's structure, which matters because downstream tool selection depends on it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so both parameters are already documented in the schema; baseline 3 applies. The description roughly restates both filters and adds the 'Magento Debuglabs/Luceed' qualifier for magento_only, but adds no syntax or example beyond the schema's own 'e.g. nalozi_prodaje'.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (List) and resource (mapped Luceed read-only resources/actions/paths), making clear this is the catalog/discovery endpoint rather than a domain data tool. It is implicitly distinguishable from the domain siblings, but never explicitly says it is the index used to find the other endpoints.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explains how to narrow results (resource id filter, magento_only=true for Magento endpoints), which is useful filter guidance. However, it never states when to reach for this tool versus the many domain siblings, nor that it is the discovery step before calling them.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.