list_users_syncs

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint=false, so safety is covered. The description adds useful pagination behavior, particularly the low default limit and the clamping of values above the endpoint maximum, which is not expressed in annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded with the core purpose, followed by a structured Args section. The repeated endpoint in the second line is somewhat redundant but does not add significant bloat.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple list endpoint with optional pagination, the description covers the main call behavior and limit semantics, and an output schema exists so return details are not required. However, it does not clarify what a 'data sync' is, whether this is scoped to the current user, or when to use sibling get_users_syncs_by_type instead.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description carries the full burden for parameters. It explains both page and limit, and goes beyond the schema by describing default limits and the clamping behavior for high limit values. It does not specify page start or default page, but otherwise compensates well.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the action 'Get data syncs' and the HTTP endpoint GET /users/syncs/, making the resource and operation clear. However, it does not distinguish itself from the related sibling get_users_syncs_by_type, which also retrieves syncs but in a more specific way.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided about when to use this tool versus alternatives such as get_users_syncs_by_type or get_users_syncs_by_id. The description only explains the basic endpoint and parameters, leaving the agent to infer the appropriate context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.