get_shows_by_id_watchnow_justwatch_links_by_country

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint=false, and the description adds little behavioral context beyond restating the GET endpoint. It does not explain what the links contain, whether external redirection is involved, or any access constraints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loaded, with no filler. The main purpose appears in the first sentence, followed by the useful endpoint path and minimal arg clarifications.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only tool with an output schema, the description is mostly adequate, but it omits country format details and does not distinguish this endpoint from similar watchnow/JustWatch siblings. Given the 0% schema coverage and rich sibling context, a bit more would make it complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate, but it only says country is a path parameter and id is the id/slug of the resource. It does not explain expected country code format, provide examples, or clarify how id/slug values can be resolved.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with 'Get show JustWatch links,' which names a specific verb and resource. It is clear enough about what the tool returns, though it does not explicitly contrast with the closely related sibling get_shows_by_id_watchnow_by_country or the movie variant.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given about when to use this tool instead of related watchnow/JustWatch endpoints. The description only restates the endpoint and args, leaving the agent to infer usage from the tool name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.