get_shows_by_id_seasons_by_season_info

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, openWorldHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds little behavioral context beyond the endpoint and parameter list; it does not mention response behavior, pagination, or extended-information effects, but it does not contradict the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and front-loaded with a one-line summary followed by the HTTP endpoint and argument list. No filler or repetition is present, though the plural 'seasons' in the summary is slightly imprecise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only GET with an output schema and safety annotations, the description is largely sufficient. Gaps include no explicit differentiation from nearby season-related tools and no detail on allowed values for 'extended', but these are minor given the endpoint clarity and structured schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description carries the burden of explaining parameters. It provides brief meanings for id ('id/slug of the resource'), season ('Season number'), and extended ('Extended information to include in the response'), but the extended description is vague and does not explain possible values or formatting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear verb and resource: get a single season for a show, reinforced by the explicit endpoint GET /shows/{id}/seasons/{season}/info. It is generally distinguishable from sibling endpoints like get_shows_by_id_seasons_by_season, but the phrase 'single seasons' is slightly awkward and does not explicitly say this returns season information rather than episode lists.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given for when to use this tool versus alternatives such as get_shows_by_id_seasons_by_season or get_shows_by_id_seasons. The endpoint path implies it is for detailed season info, but the description never states conditions, exclusions, or preferred alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.