create_movies_by_id_report

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds no behavioral context beyond what annotations already signal. It does not explain what 'report' does, what side effects occur, whether authentication is needed, or what the response represents. Annotations indicate readOnly=false and idempotent=true, but the description itself contributes no extra behavioral transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and well-structured, with a clear one-line purpose, the endpoint, and an Args section. Every line earns its place with no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

It is minimally viable for invocation: the agent knows the endpoint, the id parameter, and how to discover body fields. However, it lacks a clear definition of 'report', usage guidance, and behavioral side effects. Annotations and output schema cover some gaps, but not all.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Despite 0% schema description coverage, the description gives useful semantics: id is the id/slug and body is a request payload whose fields should be discovered via GET or /schema. This is especially valuable because the body schema is open-ended with additionalProperties.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

'Report a movie' names a specific verb and resource, and the endpoint POST /movies/{id}/report makes the operation concrete. It is distinguishable from sibling report tools by the movie resource, though 'report' itself is somewhat ambiguous (flag vs. generate report).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given for when to use this tool versus alternatives. The instruction to read the matching GET or /schema endpoint is about constructing the body, not about choosing this tool over sibling report tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.