get_translate_field_values

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It mentions returning 'translate values with descriptions and effective dates' but does not disclose behavioral traits such as whether the operation is read-only, if permissions are required, or any side effects. The description is minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences plus 'Args' and 'Returns' sections, which are brief. It is fairly concise, though the 'Args' and 'Returns' are redundant given the input schema and lack of output schema. Not verbose, but could be more streamlined.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With one parameter, no output schema, and many sibling tools, the description does not provide enough context to fully understand the tool's usage. It lacks explanation of effective dates, how results are structured, or how this tool relates to similar siblings like 'get_translate_values'.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 0% description coverage. The only parameter 'field_name' is described as 'The field name that uses translate values' in the description, adding minimal context beyond the schema's title 'Field Name'. However, it does clarify the purpose of the parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get all translate values for a field with their effective dates', specifying the verb 'get', the resource 'translate values for a field', and an additional detail about including effective dates. This distinguishes it from the sibling 'get_translate_values' which may not include dates, but the difference is not explicitly stated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'get_translate_values' or when not to use it. There is no context about prerequisites, scenarios, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.