LoL get league entries exp

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description adds 'paginated' as a trait, but does not disclose other important behaviors such as authentication needs, rate limits, data freshness, or whether the operation is read-only (likely read-only but not stated).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence that is front-loaded and direct. No wasted words; every part contributes to understanding the core purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description lacks details about return values (no output schema), pagination behavior (page size, total pages), and any constraints. For a data retrieval tool with 5 parameters, more context is needed for complete understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds 'paginated' and the order of parameters, but does not add significant meaning beyond what the schema already provides for each parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (Get), resource (league entries), and key parameters (queue, tier, division, pagination). However, it does not differentiate from the sibling tool 'lol_get_league_entries', which may have a similar purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'lol_get_league_entries' or 'lol_get_league_top'. The description lacks context about prerequisites, when not to use, or comparison with siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.