updateVersion
Update an existing version in Redmine by specifying its ID and new properties such as name, status, due date, and custom fields.
Instructions
Update version
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pathParams | Yes | ||
| bodyParams | Yes |
Update an existing version in Redmine by specifying its ID and new properties such as name, status, due date, and custom fields.
Update version
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pathParams | Yes | ||
| bodyParams | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as side effects, permissions, or idempotency. For a mutation tool, this is a significant gap.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
While the description is very short, it is under-specified. It sacrifices essential information for brevity, which reduces its usefulness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no annotations, no output schema, and a complex nested parameter structure, the description is completely inadequate. It fails to equip the agent with enough context to use the tool correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 0% description coverage, and the description adds no meaning to the parameters. The nested structure of pathParams and bodyParams is left entirely unexplained.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Update version' states a verb and resource, but 'version' is ambiguous without additional context. It is clear enough to indicate the general action but lacks specificity about what a version is, especially since sibling tools suggest a project management context.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like updateIssue or updateTimeEntry. The description does not specify any conditions, prerequisites, or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/onozaty/redmine-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server