Skip to main content
Glama
onozaty

Redmine MCP Server

by onozaty

getProject

Retrieve a specific Redmine project by its ID, with optional inclusion of related items such as trackers, categories, and custom fields.

Instructions

Show project

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pathParamsYes
queryParamsYes
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist and the description offers no behavioral details. Missing info on authentication, side effects (none expected), or return behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (two words), but it sacrifices necessary detail. It is front-loaded but incomplete.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and minimal description, the tool lacks completeness. An agent cannot determine what data is returned or how to handle the response.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has 2 parameters (format, projectId) with 0% coverage in description. The description does not explain these parameters or their purpose, forcing reliance on the schema alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Show project' clearly identifies the verb and resource, but is too vague to distinguish from siblings like getProjects. It implies a single project retrieval but lacks specifics on what is shown.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage context is provided. The description does not indicate when to use getProject versus siblings such as getProjects, getIssue, or other retrieval tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/onozaty/redmine-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server