getVersions
Retrieve version details from Redmine by specifying the version ID and output format.
Instructions
Show version
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pathParams | Yes |
Retrieve version details from Redmine by specifying the version ID and output format.
Show version
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pathParams | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must disclose behavior, but it only states 'Show version' which is insufficient. It does not indicate whether the tool is read-only, destructive, or requires authentication, nor does it describe the response format.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is too brief to be useful. While concise, it sacrifices all informative value. It does not front-load key details because there are none.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the nested object schema, absence of output schema, and lack of annotations, the description is completely inadequate. It fails to explain what the tool returns or how to use its parameters effectively.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has two parameters (format and versionId), but the description provides no explanation of their purpose, allowed values, or relationship. With 0% schema coverage, the description fails to add any meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Show version' is a tautology of the tool name 'getVersions'. It does not specify what 'version' refers to (e.g., software version, API version, or project version), nor does it distinguish it from siblings like 'getVersionsByProject'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of context, prerequisites, or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/onozaty/redmine-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server