getTrackers
List all trackers in Redmine to obtain their IDs and names for filtering issues or managing project configurations.
Instructions
List trackers
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pathParams | Yes |
List all trackers in Redmine to obtain their IDs and names for filtering issues or managing project configurations.
List trackers
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pathParams | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as permissions, rate limits, pagination, or filtering behavior, leaving the agent uninformed.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely short (two words), but under-specification makes it insufficient, not concise. It lacks necessary detail.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given one required parameter, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is completely inadequate. Does not explain what a tracker is, output format, or usage.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not mention the required 'pathParams' parameter with its 'format' enum. The agent gets no guidance on how to construct the input.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states 'List trackers', which is a specific verb+resource, but it does not clarify what 'trackers' are in the context of the system, so the purpose is vague.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like getIssueCategories or getIssueStatuses. The description offers no context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/onozaty/redmine-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server