getIssueRelation
Retrieve details of a specific issue relation in Redmine by providing its ID and desired format.
Instructions
Show issue relation
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pathParams | Yes |
Retrieve details of a specific issue relation in Redmine by providing its ID and desired format.
Show issue relation
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pathParams | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided and description does not disclose any behavioral traits (e.g., read-only, authentication, side effects). Agent has no idea what to expect.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely short but at the cost of being uninformative. No structure or front-loading of key information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Missing output schema and no description of return value. Agent cannot determine what the tool returns or how to interpret the response.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 0% description coverage and description adds no meaning to parameters. Agent does not learn what 'format' or 'issueRelationId' represent or how to use them.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description 'Show issue relation' is a tautology of the tool name 'getIssueRelation'. It does not specify what an issue relation is, nor does it distinguish from sibling like 'getIssueRelations'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings like 'getIssueRelations' or 'getIssue'. No context on prerequisites or typical use case.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/onozaty/redmine-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server