Get World Model Dashboard Overview

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, openWorldHint=true, and idempotentHint=true. The description's 'Fetch' is consistent with these hints. It adds minimal behavioral context (the aggregation scope) but does not describe what fields the summary contains or any possible limitations. With annotations covering the safety profile, this is adequate but not rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that front-loads the verb and quickly states the resource and scope. No unnecessary words or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple, zero-parameter read-only aggregate fetch, the description provides the core information needed: it returns an overall dashboard summary across all world models. It does not specify the exact structure of the summary, but given the tool's simplicity and the annotations, the description is sufficiently complete, though it could benefit from noting what metrics are included.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the empty input schema fully covers the parameter surface. The baseline for 0 parameters is 4. The description correctly implies no inputs are needed, and there is no parameter information to add.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Fetch' and clearly identifies the resource as the 'overall World Model dashboard summary across all world models'. This distinguishes it from the sibling tool 'lyzr_world_model_dashboard_by_world_model', which likely returns a per-world-model dashboard. The scope is explicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'across all world models' implies this is for aggregate data, and the existence of a per-world-model sibling suggests an alternative, but the description does not explicitly state when to use this tool over that one or provide exclusions. Guidance is implied rather than directly stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.