List KB Sync Connectors
lyzr_kbsync_connector_listList all KB Sync connectors in Lyzr to view and manage your knowledge base integrations.
Instructions
List all KB Sync connectors.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
lyzr_kbsync_connector_listList all KB Sync connectors in Lyzr to view and manage your knowledge base integrations.
List all KB Sync connectors.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate the operation is read-only, idempotent, and open-world. The description adds the behavioral detail that it lists all connectors, but does not provide additional context such as pagination or return format.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single sentence that is direct and free of any filler. It perfectly captures the tool's purpose without unnecessary detail.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple zero-parameter list operation with strong read-only annotations, the description is sufficiently complete. It clearly states the scope ('all') and the resource, which is all an agent needs to invoke it correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, so the description does not need to explain parameter semantics. The baseline for 0-param tools is 4, and the description adds no conflicting information.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states a specific action ('List') on a specific resource ('KB Sync connectors'). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like lyzr_kbsync_connector_get (single connector) and lyzr_kbsync_connector_create (create).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides clear context that this tool lists all connectors, which implies when to use it. It does not explicitly mention alternatives, but no exclusions are needed for a simple list operation.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/nandanNM/lyzr-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server