Delete A2A Agent

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description emphasizes 'Permanently delete,' which adds irreversibility context beyond the destructiveHint annotation. It also clarifies deletion is by ID, but does not discuss permissions or side effects. Annotations already cover destructive/read-only nature, so the added 'permanent' context is a meaningful bonus.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no filler. It front-loads the action ('Permanently delete'), includes the specific resource ('A2A agent record'), and the parameter identifier ('by id'). Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple single-parameter delete operation, the description is complete. It conveys the action, target, and identifier method. Annotations cover destructiveness and idempotence, and no output schema is expected for a delete operation. No significant gaps remain.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage for the single parameter agent_id, which is self-explanatory ('The A2A agent id to delete'). The description's 'by id' repeats the schema, adding no new semantic detail. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states a specific verb ('delete'), a specific resource ('A2A agent record'), and the method ('by id'). It distinguishes itself from sibling delete tools by specifying 'A2A agent' rather than generic agents.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for deleting a single A2A agent by ID, but does not explicitly state when to choose this over alternatives like lyzr_delete_agent or lyzr_bulk_delete_agents. No exclusions or alternative guidance is provided, so usage context is only implied.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.