get_workflow_execution

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description adds required scope but lacks details on error handling, idempotency, or return behavior beyond the execution retrieval. Moderate transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences, each providing essential information: operation and prerequisite. No redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequate for a simple single-parameter retrieval tool. Lacks mention of response format or error cases, but sufficiently complete given low complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers 100% with description for 'id' param as UUID. Description repeats the parameter requirement implicitly but adds no extra meaning beyond the schema. Baseline 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the action 'Get' and resource 'single Dynatrace Automation workflow execution by ID', with platform version specified. Distinguishes from sibling 'list_workflow_executions'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Mentions required scope 'automation:workflows:read', implying read-only usage. No explicit when-not or alternatives, but the sibling list tool contextualizes single vs. multiple usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.