create_self_notification

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description states it is a write operation, but without annotations, it does not disclose any behavioral traits such as permissions required, whether it overrides existing notifications, rate limits, or side effects. The 'WRITE' tag is minimal transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that immediately states the purpose and operation type. It is concise with no unnecessary words, though it could be slightly expanded for context without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has only one parameter and no output schema, the description is adequate but not complete. It does not explain what the notification spec is, how the notification is delivered, or what the response looks like. For a self-notification tool, more context about its purpose and behavior would be beneficial.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has one required parameter 'notification' with a description that says 'Notification definition object. Pass all required fields per the notification spec.' The tool description does not add any additional meaning beyond what the schema provides. Since schema coverage is 100%, the baseline score is 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the action (Create) and the resource (self-notification), and includes 'WRITE, platform notification v1' which specifies it's a write operation and the API version. This differentiates it from read/update/delete siblings. However, it does not explain what a self-notification is or what it does beyond creation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like create_event_notification or other notification creation tools. There is no mention of prerequisites or context for using self-notifications.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.