get_filter_segment
Retrieve a filter segment by its unique identifier (UID) from Dynatrace storage.
Instructions
Get a filter segment by UID (platform storage filter-segments v1).
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| uid | Yes |
Retrieve a filter segment by its unique identifier (UID) from Dynatrace storage.
Get a filter segment by UID (platform storage filter-segments v1).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| uid | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It only states it's a 'get' operation by UID, but does not disclose any behavioral traits such as permissions, rate limits, or side effects. Minor version info adds little value.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One sentence, front-loaded with action and resource. No wasted words. Efficient and clear.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple getter by ID with no output schema and no annotations, the description is adequate but lacks explicit mention of return value or error conditions. However, it is sufficient for an AI agent to understand the basic purpose.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0% (description does not mention the parameter 'uid'). The description says 'by UID' but does not explain format, constraints, or source. Adds minimal context beyond what the schema already implies (uid is an identifier).
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (Get), the resource (filter segment), and the identifier (by UID). It also mentions the API version, distinguishing it from sibling tools like create_filter_segment, delete_filter_segment, update_filter_segment, and list_filter_segments.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., list_filter_segments for listing all). No prerequisites or when-not-to-use context provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mnmozi/dynatrace-mcp-saas'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server