get_self_notification

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description only states it's a retrieval operation. It does not disclose any behavioral traits such as rate limits, permissions, or error handling (e.g., what happens if the ID does not exist). For a read-only tool, the description lacks necessary transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, concise and front-loaded. It contains no unnecessary words and efficiently conveys the tool's purpose. However, it is very brief, which sacrifices some completeness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (single parameter, no output schema), the description is minimal but partially sufficient. It does not explain what a self-notification is, what the response contains, or error scenarios. For a simple retrieval tool, it covers the basics but lacks depth.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers 100% of parameters (single 'id' field with description 'Self-notification UUID.'). The description adds 'by ID' but this is already evident from the required parameter. Since schema_coverage is high, baseline is 3, and the description does not add extra meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Get', the resource 'self-notification', and the unique identifier 'by ID'. It also specifies the version 'platform notification v1'. Among siblings like list_self_notifications, it clearly distinguishes itself as a single-item retrieval.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like list_self_notifications. There is no mention of when to use this tool or when not to, leaving the agent to infer without context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.