google_delete_one_time_product

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden and does not state that deletion is permanent/irreversible, whether the product must be inactive first, or whether a commit_edit is required to apply the change. 'Delete' implies mutation but nothing about consequences or workflow is disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is a single short sentence with no waste, but the brevity comes at the cost of under-specification rather than genuine efficiency. Front-loaded yes, but nearly empty.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive mutation with no annotations and no output schema, an agent would need to know about edit-session requirements, irreversibility, and error cases; none of this is present. The definition is too thin for the tool's risk profile.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and both parameters (productId, packageName) are documented in the schema itself, so baseline 3 applies. The description adds no syntax, format, or scoping detail beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description gives a verb ('Delete') and a resource ('one-time product'), which does distinguish it from google_delete_iap, google_delete_subscription_group and other delete siblings. However, it is little more than an expansion of the tool name, adding only the 'one-time' qualifier.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this versus google_update_one_time_product, google_delete_iap, or a deactivate path, and no mention of prerequisites such as being inside an edit session. The agent must infer everything from the name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.