app-publish-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to app-publish-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceApp Store Connect MCP server — lets AI agents manage iOS releases, TestFlight builds, screenshots, and review submissions directly from App Store Connect.25 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceApp Store Connect MCP Server (Swift) that manages apps, builds, TestFlight, metadata, reviews natively on macOSMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for managing mobile app releases on App Store Connect and Google Play. It exposes 101 tools for iOS and Android release lifecycle and reacts to EAS/GitHub webhooks automatically.382 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceAn MCP server to communicate with the App Store Connect API for iOS Developers25117 npm331MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets AI agents drive App Store Connect, Google Play Console, and Expo EAS end to end — builds, listings, screenshots, privacy labels, in-app purchases, review submission and even replying to App Review. It automates roughly 60 tools so an app can go from a build to 'Waiting for Review' without clicking through two consoles.6019MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that drives the full App Store release cycle for iOS and macOS apps: version bump, archive + TestFlight upload, metadata, review submission, and status.840 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 188 tools
Platform prefixes and detailed descriptions separate most Apple vs Google and resource/action pairs. However, the set contains confusing overlaps: deprecated screenshot tools alongside the Asset Library/placement tools, and two Apple review-submission paths (`apple_submit_for_review` vs. `apple_create_review_submission` + `apple_add_review_submission_item` + `apple_submit_review_submission`). These overlaps make misselection plausible without careful reading.
Tool names consistently follow a platform-prefixed snake_case verb_noun pattern (`apple_list_*`, `google_create_*`, etc.), including wait/search/query variants. The minor legacy exceptions still fit the same predictable convention.
188 tools is far beyond a manageable set for an MCP server, even for a broad app-publishing domain. This harms discoverability and tool selection; the rubric treats 50+ tools as an extreme mismatch.
The surface covers app metadata, versions/builds/uploads, assets/placements, pricing/availability, IAP/subscriptions/offer codes, reviews, beta testing, analytics/finance, certificates/profiles/devices, and Google edit/release/vitals workflows. Some lifecycle gaps remain, such as Apple IAP update and subscription-group get/update, but core workflows are well covered.