apple_delete_treatment_localization

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden and does not meet it. 'Remove' implies a destructive mutation, but nothing states whether the deletion is permanent, whether it requires the treatment to be in an editable state, or what happens to the treatment if its last locale is deleted.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single efficient phrase with zero filler and the action front-loaded. The terseness is under-specification rather than verbosity, so it is not penalized heavily here.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

A destructive, non-annotated tool with an undocumented required parameter and no output schema needs more than five words. Nothing tells the agent how to obtain a valid localizationId (presumably via apple_list_treatment_localizations) or what the call returns.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the single parameter is undocumented, but the description does establish that the parameter selects the locale to remove. It leaves the key ambiguity unresolved: whether localizationId is the locale code (e.g. 'en-US') or the opaque ID of an existing localization resource.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('Remove') and resource ('a locale from a treatment'), which is enough to separate it from apple_delete_experiment_treatment and apple_delete_custom_product_page_localization. It stops short of naming those siblings or stating the parent treatment relationship, so a 4 rather than a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this versus apple_update_treatment_localization or the experiment-treatment deletion tool, no prerequisites (e.g., experiment must be in a draft state), and no mention of what happens when the last localization is removed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.