apple_delete_custom_product_page_localization

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full behavioral burden, and it does not say whether the removal is permanent, what happens to translated content, what permissions are required, or what the response contains. The only real signal is the mildly implied 'editable' state constraint.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with no filler or repetition. Its brevity is efficient, though the terse phrasing leaves little room for the missing behavioral and parameter detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive single-parameter tool with no annotations and no output schema, the definition omits too much. It does not explain ID provenance, irreversibility, or the editable-version prerequisite.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter localizationId has 0% schema description coverage, so the description must compensate. It only says 'a locale,' which does not explain that the parameter is an opaque identifier or how to obtain it via apple_list_custom_product_page_localizations before deleting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: 'Remove a locale from an editable custom product page version.' That clearly separates it from apple_delete_custom_product_page and apple_delete_treatment_localization. It stops short of naming those siblings or noting that the target is a localization record rather than just a locale string.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The word 'editable' hints that the parent version must be in an editable state, but no explicit precondition is stated. There is no guidance on when to delete versus update a localization, and no alternative tool is named.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.