apple_delete_iap

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description indicates a destructive action ('Delete') but fails to disclose behavioral traits such as irreversibility, side effects (e.g., affecting related resources like pricing), or required permissions. With no annotations provided, this gap is significant.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise with a single sentence, but it may be too minimal. While it avoids excess, it misses opportunities to add value in other dimensions.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of annotations and output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not clarify return values, confirmation messages, or error scenarios, leaving the agent unsure about the outcome of the operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

While schema description coverage is 100%, the description adds no meaning beyond the schema's own description of 'iapId'. It does not clarify the format, origin, or validation constraints for the parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'Delete' and the resource 'in-app purchase', which is a specific verb+resource combination. While it does not differentiate from sibling tools that delete other entities, the resource name is distinct enough given the context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidelines are provided. The description does not mention when to use this tool versus alternatives like apple_get_iap or apple_list_iap, nor does it specify prerequisites such as the need for the in-app purchase to exist.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.