create_relationships

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description bears full weight, but it only states 'Create' without disclosing error handling, validation, batch size limits, or return values. The description is too brief for a write operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The single sentence is short and front-loaded, but conciseness comes at the expense of missing critical details. It is not optimally balanced.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (batch operation with nested objects, enum types) and lack of annotations or output schema, the description is insufficient. It omits nearly all behavioral and contextual detail.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, yet the description adds no information about parameters like relationships array structure, source_id, or user_id. Meaningful parameter guidance is entirely absent.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states the verb 'Create', the resource 'typed relationships between existing entities', and the scope 'in one batch'. This clearly distinguishes it from the singleton sibling 'create_relationship'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., create_relationship for single relationships), nor are there any prerequisites or exclusions mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.