ResendEmailActivation
Resend an email activation notification to users who missed or need a new activation link, enabling them to verify their account.
Instructions
Resend email activation
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Resend an email activation notification to users who missed or need a new activation link, enabling them to verify their account.
Resend email activation
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as side effects (e.g., sending an email), authentication requirements, or state changes. The tool's behavior is opaque.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise with one short sentence that is front-loaded. No unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no annotations, no output schema, and zero parameters, the description is too minimal. It fails to explain what activation is being resent or what the agent should expect. Essential context is missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has no parameters, so schema description coverage is 100%. The description correctly implies no parameters are needed. Baseline is 3, but the simplicity warrants a 4.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Resend email activation' clearly states the action and resource (email activation). It is a verb+resource format. However, it does not specify which type of activation (e.g., user account or subscription), but given sibling tools like ActivateUserAccount, it likely refers to user account activation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No usage guidance provided. The description does not indicate when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it specify prerequisites or context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ktmcp-cli/beezup'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server