Access channel catalog data to review and manage your BeezUP store configurations.
Get the channel catalog information
This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.
{
"id": 1,
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"arguments": {},
"name": "GetChannelCatalog"
}
}| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.0.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, and the description lacks any behavioral disclosure. It does not mention whether the operation is read-only, what data is returned, or any side effects. The agent receives no guidance on expected behavior.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely short (6 words), but it is under-specified rather than concise. It wastes the opportunity to provide useful information, and the brevity is detrimental to understanding.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of output schema and annotations, the description is entirely inadequate. It does not explain what information is returned, how it is structured, or any context for using the tool. The tool's role in the context of many sibling tools is unclear.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has no parameters, and the schema coverage is 100% (empty schema). The description does not add any parameter-level meaning beyond the schema. Following guidelines, the baseline for 0 parameters is 4, but the description fails to compensate with clarity, resulting in a score of 3.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states 'Get the channel catalog information' which is vague. It does not specify what specific information is retrieved, especially compared to sibling tools like GetChannelCatalogs or GetChannelCatalogCategories. The verb 'Get' is clear but the resource 'channel catalog information' is ambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No usage guidelines are provided. The description does not specify when to use this tool versus alternatives such as GetChannelCatalogs or GetChannelCatalogProductInfo, leading to potential confusion for an AI agent.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.