Retrieve offer pricing from BeezUP Merchant API by submitting a request body. Enables price data access for store management and configuration.
Get offer pricing
This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.
{
"id": 1,
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"arguments": {},
"name": "GetOffer"
}
}| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| body | No | Request body |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.0.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. Only 'Get offer pricing' implies a read operation, but no confirmation of idempotency, side effects, authentication needs, rate limits, or data scope. The agent cannot infer safety or behaviors.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single phrase is concise but overly brief. It lacks necessary structural elements like a distinct summary or usage hints. While not verbose, the brevity sacrifices clarity for conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and low parameter clarity, the description misses critical context like return value format, pagination, or error handling. With many sibling tools, more details are required to distinguish and use correctly. Incomplete for safe invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Only one parameter 'body' is an object with vague description 'Request body'. Schema coverage is 100% but the tool description adds no extra meaning about what the body should contain. The agent must guess the structure, which is insufficient.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description states 'Get offer pricing' which is a clear verb+resource pair, but lacks specificity about what an 'offer' refers to in this context. Among many similar 'Get' sibling tools, it does not differentiate itself (e.g., GetOffer vs GetStore, GetContracts). The purpose is understandable but vague.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like GetContracts or GetStore. The description does not mention any prerequisites, scenarios, or exclusions. Siblings are numerous but not referenced, leaving the agent without decision support.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.