Auto_ConfigureAutoImportInterval

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It fails to indicate whether the tool is idempotent, triggers side effects, requires specific permissions, or changes state. The word 'configure' implies mutation but no further details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely short but at the cost of clarity. The description is under-specified and fails to provide actionable information; it does not earn its place given the tool's complexity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With a single opaque parameter, no output schema, and no behavioral context, the description is completely inadequate. The agent cannot determine how to invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter 'body' is described only as 'Request body', adding no meaning beyond the schema. The nested object structure is undocumented, leaving the agent without necessary details about required fields or allowed values.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description states 'Configure Auto Import Interval', which identifies the verb and resource, but 'configure' is vague and doesn't clarify whether it sets, updates, or enables the interval. Sibling tools like Auto_ScheduleAutoImport suggest overlap, but no differentiation is provided.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like Auto_ScheduleAutoImport or Importation_ActivateAutoImport. No conditions, prerequisites, or exclusions are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.