Catalog_GetProductByProductId
Retrieve complete product details using the product identifier.
Instructions
Get product by ProductId
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| productId | Yes | The product identifier you want to get |
Retrieve complete product details using the product identifier.
Get product by ProductId
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| productId | Yes | The product identifier you want to get |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as read-only nature, required permissions, or potential limitations. The agent is left unaware of side effects or access requirements.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise at just three words, which is efficient but does not provide enough context. It front-loads the key action but omits necessary details.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the complexity of sibling tools and the single parameter, the description is insufficient. It lacks information on return format, error cases, and does not clarify what a product ID represents.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema describes the single parameter with a description that aligns with the tool's purpose. Since schema coverage is 100%, the description adds no additional value beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the action and resource (get product by ProductId). However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like Catalog_GetProductBySku which retrieves a product by a different identifier.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as Catalog_GetProductBySku or Catalog_GetProducts. The description lacks context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ktmcp-cli/beezup'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server