image-tools-mcp
Herramientas de imagen MCP
Un servicio de Protocolo de Contexto de Modelo (MCP) para recuperar dimensiones de imágenes y comprimir imágenes, compatible con fuentes de archivos locales y URL.
Características
Recuperar dimensiones de imágenes a partir de URL
Obtener las dimensiones de la imagen desde archivos locales
Comprimir imágenes desde URL usando la API TinyPNG
Comprimir imágenes locales usando la API TinyPNG
Convertir imágenes a diferentes formatos (webp, jpeg/jpg, png)
Devuelve información de ancho, alto, tipo, tipo MIME y compresión.
Resultados de ejemplo


Descargar desde la URL de Figma y comprimir
Related MCP server: test-1
Uso
Utilizando como servicio MCP
Este servicio proporciona cinco funciones de herramienta:
get_image_size- Obtener las dimensiones de las imágenes remotasget_local_image_size- Obtener las dimensiones de las imágenes localescompress_image_from_url- Comprime imágenes remotas usando la API TinyPNGcompress_local_image: comprime imágenes locales usando la API TinyPNGfigma: obtiene enlaces de imágenes de la API de Figma y los comprime usando la API TinyPNG
Integración de clientes
Para usar este servicio MCP, debe conectarse desde un cliente MCP. A continuación, se muestran ejemplos de integración con diferentes clientes:
Uso con Claude Desktop
Instalar Claude Desktop desde claude.ai/download
Obtenga la clave API de TinyPNG: Visite TinyPNG y obtenga su clave API
Configure Claude Desktop para utilizar este servidor MCP editando el archivo de configuración:
{
"mcpServers": {
"image-tools": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["image-tools-mcp"],
"env": {
"TINIFY_API_KEY": "<YOUR_TINIFY_API_KEY>",
"FIGMA_API_TOKEN": "<YOUR_FIGMA_API_TOKEN>"
}
}
}
}Reiniciar Claude Desktop
Pídele a Claude que obtenga las dimensiones de la imagen: "¿Puedes decirme las dimensiones de esta imagen: https://example.com/image.jpg ?"
Pídele a Claude que comprima una imagen: "¿Puedes comprimir esta imagen: https://example.com/image.jpg ? "
Pídele a Claude que comprima una imagen local: "¿Puedes comprimir esta imagen: D:/path/to/image.png?"
Pídele a Claude que comprima una carpeta de imágenes local: "¿Puedes comprimir esta carpeta: D:/imageFolder?"
Pídele a Claude que obtenga enlaces de imágenes de la API de Figma: "¿Puedes obtener enlaces de imágenes de la API de Figma: https://www.figma.com/file/XXXXXXX ?"
Uso con la biblioteca de cliente MCP
import { McpClient } from "@modelcontextprotocol/client";
// Initialize the client
const client = new McpClient({
transport: "stdio" // or other transport options
});
// Connect to the server
await client.connect();
// Get image dimensions from URL
const urlResult = await client.callTool("get_image_size", {
options: {
imageUrl: "https://example.com/image.jpg"
}
});
console.log(JSON.parse(urlResult.content[0].text));
// Output: { width: 800, height: 600, type: "jpg", mime: "image/jpeg" }
// Get image dimensions from local file
const localResult = await client.callTool("get_local_image_size", {
options: {
imagePath: "D:/path/to/image.png"
}
});
console.log(JSON.parse(localResult.content[0].text));
// Output: { width: 1024, height: 768, type: "png", mime: "image/png", path: "D:/path/to/image.png" }
// Compress image from URL
const compressUrlResult = await client.callTool("compress_image_from_url", {
options: {
imageUrl: "https://example.com/image.jpg",
outputFormat: "webp" // Optional: convert to webp, jpeg/jpg, or png
}
});
console.log(JSON.parse(compressUrlResult.content[0].text));
// Output: { originalSize: 102400, compressedSize: 51200, compressionRatio: "50.00%", tempFilePath: "/tmp/compressed_1615456789.webp", format: "webp" }
// Compress local image
const compressLocalResult = await client.callTool("compress_local_image", {
options: {
imagePath: "D:/path/to/image.png",
outputPath: "D:/path/to/compressed.webp", // Optional
outputFormat: "image/webp" // Optional: convert to image/webp, image/jpeg, or image/png
}
});
console.log(JSON.parse(compressLocalResult.content[0].text));
// Output: { originalSize: 102400, compressedSize: 51200, compressionRatio: "50.00%", outputPath: "D:/path/to/compressed.webp", format: "webp" }
// Fetch image links from Figma API
const figmaResult = await client.callTool("figma", {
options: {
figmaUrl: "https://www.figma.com/file/XXXXXXX"
}
});
console.log(JSON.parse(figmaResult.content[0].text));
// Output: { imageLinks: ["https://example.com/image1.jpg", "https://example.com/image2.jpg"] }
### Tool Schemas
#### get_image_size
```typescript
{
options: {
imageUrl: string // URL of the image to retrieve dimensions for
}
}obtener_tamaño_de_imagen_local
{
options: {
imagePath: string; // Absolute path to the local image file
}
}comprimir_imagen_desde_url
{
options: {
imageUrl: string // URL of the image to compress
outputFormat?: "image/webp" | "image/jpeg" | "image/jpg" | "image/png" // Optional output format
}
}comprimir_imagen_local
{
options: {
imagePath: string // Absolute path to the local image file
outputPath?: string // Optional absolute path for the compressed output image
outputFormat?: "image/webp" | "image/jpeg" | "image/jpg" | "image/png" // Optional output format
}
}Figma
{
options: {
figmaUrl: string; // URL of the Figma file to fetch image links from
}
}Registro de cambios
12/05/2025: Se actualizó la API de Figma para admitir parámetros adicionales, incluido un escalado de imagen de 2x.
Implementación técnica
Este proyecto se basa en las siguientes bibliotecas:
probe-image-size : para la detección de la dimensión de la imagen
tinify - Para la compresión de imágenes a través de la API TinyPNG
figma-api : para obtener enlaces de imágenes de la API de Figma
Variables de entorno
TINIFY_API_KEY: Necesaria para la compresión de imágenes. Obtén tu clave API de TinyPNG.Cuando no se proporcionan, las herramientas de compresión (
compress_image_from_urlycompress_local_image) no se registrarán
FIGMA_API_TOKEN: Necesario para obtener enlaces de imágenes de la API de Figma. Obtén tu token de API de Figma.Cuando no se proporciona, la herramienta Figma (
figma) no se registrará
Nota: Las herramientas básicas de dimensión de imagen ( get_image_size y get_local_image_size ) siempre están disponibles independientemente de las claves API.
Licencia
Instituto Tecnológico de Massachusetts (MIT)
Available Tools
2 toolsget_image_sizeC
Get the size of an image from URL
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| options | Yes | Options for retrieving image size |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states what the tool does but lacks details on performance (e.g., network timeouts, rate limits), error handling (e.g., invalid URLs, unsupported formats), or output format (e.g., dimensions in pixels). This leaves significant gaps for a tool that performs network operations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, direct sentence with zero wasted words. It front-loads the core purpose ('Get the size of an image') and efficiently specifies the source ('from URL'). Every word earns its place, making it highly concise and well-structured.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's network-based operation and lack of annotations or output schema, the description is incomplete. It doesn't address critical context like what 'size' means (e.g., dimensions, file size), potential errors, or response format. For a tool with no structured output documentation, this leaves too much unspecified.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema fully documents the single parameter 'imageUrl'. The description adds no additional semantic context beyond implying the URL is for an image, which is already clear from the parameter name. This meets the baseline for high schema coverage but doesn't enhance understanding.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Get the size') and resource ('an image from URL'), making the purpose immediately understandable. It distinguishes from the sibling tool 'get_local_image_size' by specifying the image source as 'from URL' rather than local. However, it doesn't explicitly contrast with the sibling, so it's not a perfect 5.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus its sibling 'get_local_image_size'. There's no mention of prerequisites, alternative scenarios, or exclusion criteria. The agent must infer usage from the name and description alone without explicit direction.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_local_image_sizeC
Get the size of a local image
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| options | Yes | Options for retrieving local image size |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states what the tool does but doesn't add context beyond the basic action—missing details like error handling, performance implications, or what the output looks like (e.g., dimensions in pixels). This leaves significant gaps for a tool that interacts with local files.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, efficient sentence with zero waste, front-loading the core purpose without unnecessary details. It's appropriately sized for a simple tool, making it easy to parse quickly.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of annotations and output schema, the description is incomplete for a tool that reads local files. It doesn't explain the return value (e.g., width and height), error cases, or security considerations, leaving the agent with insufficient context to use it effectively beyond the basic parameter.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 100% description coverage, documenting the 'imagePath' parameter as an absolute path. The description doesn't add any meaning beyond this, such as format examples or constraints, so it meets the baseline of 3 where the schema does the heavy lifting without extra value from the description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'size of a local image', making the purpose specific and understandable. However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from its sibling 'get_image_size', which might handle remote images or have different scope, leaving room for ambiguity in sibling distinction.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as its sibling 'get_image_size'. It lacks context on prerequisites, exclusions, or specific scenarios, offering only a basic statement of function without usage instructions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
2 tool updates
v1.0.0- First observed
get_image_size - First observed
get_local_image_size
TDQS
The two tools have overlapping purposes—both retrieve image sizes—with only the source (URL vs. local) differing. This creates ambiguity as an agent might misselect between them if the input context is unclear, such as when 'image' could refer to either type. The descriptions help slightly by specifying the source, but the core functionality is identical, leading to potential confusion.
The tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'get_image_size' and 'get_local_image_size', both using snake_case and starting with 'get'. This predictability makes it easy for an agent to understand the naming convention and infer tool purposes without deviation or mixed styles.
With only 2 tools, the server feels thin and under-scoped for an 'image-tools' domain, which typically implies a broader set of operations like resizing, converting, or analyzing images. The limited count suggests incomplete coverage, as basic image manipulation tasks beyond size retrieval are missing, making it inadequate for comprehensive image handling.
The tool set is severely incomplete for an image processing domain, covering only size retrieval from two sources. There are significant gaps in common operations such as resizing, cropping, format conversion, or metadata extraction, which will likely cause agent failures when attempting typical image-related tasks. The surface lacks core functionality needed for a coherent image tools server.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Convert images to PNG, JPEG, WebP, or AVIF through one public remote MCP tool.
Resize, convert, compress, crop, thumbnail and watermark images from your AI chat.
Resize, compress, convert, watermark and SEO-tag e-commerce product images from a public URL.
AI-powered image processing via GPU. Remove backgrounds and upscale images (2x/4x) directly from any MCP client. OAuth 2.1 authenticated, returns processed images inline with download links. Free credits on signup at maskr.io.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for local compression of various image formats12433MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenance🧙🏻 Integrated TinyPNG MCP server, quickly use TinyPNG through LLMs.39Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides AI agents with tools to convert images between formats and inspect image metadata, enabling seamless image processing within agent workflows.253MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for tinify.ai image optimization. AI-powered upscaling, resizing/cropping, compression, and SEO filename & alt text generation — all in one tool.5332MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/kshern/image-tools-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server