asana_add_task_dependencies

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only says 'Set dependencies' without explaining whether this replaces or adds to existing dependencies, what happens on error, or if special permissions are required. This is a minimal mutation description with zero behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence with no fluff, but it is under-specified. It essentially restates the tool name with minimal added value. While concise, it lacks the detail expected for a tool description, so it is not well-optimized for usefulness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

This is a mutation tool with no annotations and no output schema. The description fails to explain return values, idempotency, whether dependencies are appended or replaced, or how it relates to sibling tools. For a simple but consequential operation, this is severely incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage, describing both task_id and dependencies array. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, such as relationship semantics or edge cases. Baseline 3 is appropriate given the schema completeness.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Set' and resource 'dependencies for a task', making the specific action unambiguous. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from the sibling tool asana_add_task_dependents, though the term 'dependencies' helps indicate direction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like asana_add_task_dependents or asana_update_task. There are no preconditions, exclusions, or context about when this action is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.