A
licenseB
qualityC
maintenancePerform Asana operations from an MCP Client such as Anthropic's Claude Desktop Application, and many more.
22
1,756 npm
148
MIT
asana-mcp
by katxuyu
Related Servers
Alternatives to asana-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude to interact with Asana workspaces, tasks and projects through the Asana API, allowing users to search, create, update, and manage Asana tasks and projects using natural language.1,756 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP (Multi-Agent Conversation Protocol) server that enables interacting with the Asana API through natural language commands for task management, project organization, and team collaboration.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceIntegrates Asana, GitHub, and Slack into MCP-compatible clients like Claude and Cursor, enabling task management, messaging, and project management through natural language.6 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to fully interact with Asana, including creating and managing tasks, projects, time tracking, and search, all through natural language.8617 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables to interact with Asana through Claude, with read and write tools for tasks, projects, tags, and custom fields, with no destructive operations.37 npmMIT
TDQS
C2.8/5.0
Scored across 26 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Every tool targets a specific resource and action, with clear separation between user, task, project, workspace, and tag operations. Retrieve operations like get, list, and search are clearly differentiated by their parameters and purpose.
Naming Consistency4/5
All tools follow the asana_verb_noun pattern with mostly consistent snake_case. The only notable deviation is use of 'list' for workspaces while other plural retrievals use 'get' (e.g., get_users_in_workspace), but this is a minor irregularity.
Tool Count2/5
With 26 tools, the set exceeds the 25-tool threshold considered too heavy. The count is inflated by multiple user retrieval variants and status endpoints, making it more difficult for agents to navigate.
Completeness2/5
The server lacks fundamental CRUD operations: projects cannot be created, updated, or deleted, and tasks have no delete operation. Tag management is similarly limited, leaving significant gaps that will cause agent failures in basic workflows.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues