cm_update_admin

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description says 'and/or' implying partial updates, but the schema requires all three parameters, creating a contradiction. Annotations provide idempotentHint true, which matches update semantics, but the description does not disclose that all fields are mandatory or other behavioral aspects like response or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise at one sentence, but the 'and/or' phrasing is ambiguous given the required schema. Front-loaded and efficient, but could be clearer.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 3 required parameters and no output schema, the description fails to explain return values, error conditions, or what happens if the admin doesn't exist. The mismatch between description and schema further reduces completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with clear descriptions for each parameter. The description adds no additional meaning beyond restating the updatable fields. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb (update) and the resource (administrator), and specifies the updatable fields (email and name). It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like cm_add_admin and cm_delete_admin.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No mention of prerequisites (e.g., admin must exist) or exclusions. The description only states the action without context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.