cm_delete_list
Permanently delete a list and all its subscribers from Campaign Monitor.
Instructions
⚠️ Permanently delete a list and all its subscribers.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| listId | Yes | List ID. |
Permanently delete a list and all its subscribers from Campaign Monitor.
⚠️ Permanently delete a list and all its subscribers.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| listId | Yes | List ID. |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already provide destructiveHint: true, but the description adds context: the deletion is permanent and also removes all subscribers. This goes beyond the annotation by specifying the scope and irreversibility, which is valuable for agent decision-making.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence front-loaded with a warning emoji. Every word adds value, and there is no superfluous information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (single parameter, no output schema), the description is complete. It fully explains the action and its effect. No additional details are needed for this straightforward deletion tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%: listId has a description 'List ID.' The tool description does not add any additional meaning beyond what the schema provides. Baseline of 3 is appropriate as the schema already documents the parameter adequately.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action: 'Permanently delete a list and all its subscribers.' It uses a specific verb ('delete') and resource ('list and all its subscribers'), and distinguishes from sibling tools like cm_delete_segment or cm_delete_subscriber by specifying the cascading deletion of subscribers.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description does not provide any guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It lacks explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use information, nor does it mention prerequisites or consequences beyond the deletion itself.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/kanopi/campaign-monitor-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server