cm_get_system_date
Get the current date and time in your Campaign Monitor account's timezone.
Instructions
Get the current date and time in the account's timezone.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Get the current date and time in your Campaign Monitor account's timezone.
Get the current date and time in the account's timezone.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description adds value beyond the readOnlyHint annotation by specifying the timezone context. It clearly indicates a read-only operation with no side effects, aligned with annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, concise, and front-loaded with the main action. No unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description covers the main functionality and timezone context, but lacks details about return format. For a simple tool without output schema, it is mostly complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With no parameters and 100% schema coverage, the description does not need to add parameter details. Baseline 4 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool retrieves the current date and time, with a specific resource (system date) and context (account's timezone). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools, which are primarily focused on specific entities or actions.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for obtaining the current date/time, but lacks explicit guidance on when to use or alternatives. However, given the tool's simplicity and lack of parameters, the context is clear.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/kanopi/campaign-monitor-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server