Skip to main content
Glama
kanopi

Campaign Monitor MCP Server

by kanopi

cm_authenticate_sending_domain

Verify DNS records for a sending domain to authenticate and improve email deliverability.

Instructions

Verify/authenticate the DNS records for a client's sending domain.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
DomainYesDomain to authenticate.
clientIdYesClient ID (a hex string identifying the client).
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations beyond title, the description fails to disclose whether this is a read-only or mutating operation, side effects, permission requirements, or error behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, 9 words, front-loaded with action verb. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequate for a simple tool with 2 parameters and no output schema, but lacks details on return value or error conditions.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline 3 is appropriate. Description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema descriptions for Domain and clientId.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (verify/authenticate), resource (DNS records for a client's sending domain), and distinguishes from sibling tools like cm_add_sending_domain and cm_get_sending_domains.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives, nor prerequisites like needing to have added the domain first via cm_add_sending_domain.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/kanopi/campaign-monitor-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server