ebay_get_email_campaign
Retrieve details of a specific email campaign by providing its campaign ID.
Instructions
Get details of a specific email campaign.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| emailCampaignId | Yes | Email campaign ID |
Retrieve details of a specific email campaign by providing its campaign ID.
Get details of a specific email campaign.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| emailCampaignId | Yes | Email campaign ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, so the description must inform behavior. It does not disclose that the operation is read-only, mention permissions, rate limits, or what the response contains. Minimal transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single concise sentence, no wasted words. While short, it is acceptable for a simple tool, though more context could be added without harming conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema provided, yet the description does not mention what details are returned (e.g., status, name, settings). Incomplete for a retrieval tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with one parameter emailCampaignId. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema's 'Email campaign ID.' Baseline score applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get details of a specific email campaign' clearly states the action (get) and resource (email campaign), is distinct from siblings like ebay_get_email_campaigns (list) and ebay_create_email_campaign (create). However, it does not specify what 'details' entails.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like ebay_get_email_campaigns (for listing) or ebay_get_email_report. No prerequisites or context provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/jyarbro/ebay-seller-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server