ebay_create_custom_policy
Create custom policies for eBay listings with name and type, plus optional description and label.
Instructions
Create a new custom policy
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| policy | Yes | Custom policy details |
Create custom policies for eBay listings with name and type, plus optional description and label.
Create a new custom policy
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| policy | Yes | Custom policy details |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits like write operations, required permissions, or side effects. The word 'Create' implies mutation, but no further details are given.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very concise (5 words) but lacks necessary detail. While brevity is good, it doesn't provide enough information to be fully useful.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has a complex nested parameter and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not explain what a custom policy is, policy types, or any constraints, leaving significant gaps for an agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents the 'policy' parameter structure. The description adds no additional meaning or constraints beyond what the schema provides, resulting in a baseline score of 3.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Create a new custom policy' uses a specific verb and resource, clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools that create other entities (e.g., ads, campaigns, bundles).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as other policy creation tools (e.g., ebay_create_fulfillment_policy, ebay_create_payment_policy). The description lacks context for appropriate use.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/jyarbro/ebay-seller-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server