ebay_clone_package
Duplicate an existing eBay package by providing its ID to streamline inventory management.
Instructions
Clone a package to create a duplicate
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| packageId | Yes | The package ID to clone |
Duplicate an existing eBay package by providing its ID to streamline inventory management.
Clone a package to create a duplicate
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| packageId | Yes | The package ID to clone |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Without annotations, the description carries full burden but only states the basic action. It fails to disclose what is duplicated (e.g., name, fields, restrictions), any side effects, or required permissions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, clear sentence with no wasted words. However, it could be restructured to include more context without adding length.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple clone tool with one parameter, the description is minimally adequate but lacks expected context such as return value (e.g., new package ID) and any constraints on cloning.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and describes packageId as 'The package ID to clone'. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action 'Clone a package' and the result 'create a duplicate'. It is specific to packages, distinguishing it from sibling clone tools for ads, ad groups, campaigns, etc.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like ebay_clone_ad or ebay_clone_campaign. The agent lacks context for proper tool selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/jyarbro/ebay-seller-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server