Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Sophos Firewall MCP Server

Sophos Firewall MCP Server

by jelmervdm
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

sophos_list_live_users

Read-only

List active logged-in user sessions on Sophos Firewall to monitor live user logins and session counts.

Instructions

List active logged-in user sessions on Sophos Firewall.

Use when monitoring live user logins, active session counts, or connected users.

Args: client: Optional SophosFirewallClient instance.

Returns: List or dict of live user sessions.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "sophos_list_live_users"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
clientNo

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.2.0

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, so safety is covered. The description adds that it lists 'active logged-in user sessions' but does not disclose other traits like pagination, limits, or effects; minimal extra value beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Highly concise: one sentence for purpose, one for usage, then args/returns. No wasted words, front-loaded with key information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple list tool with one optional parameter and an output schema, the description is complete. It specifies the action, usage, parameter semantics, and return type, requiring no further elaboration.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Despite 0% schema description coverage, the description explains that 'client' is an optional SophosFirewallClient instance, adding meaning beyond the schema's default null. Clarifies type and optionality.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'List' and the resource 'active logged-in user sessions on Sophos Firewall', distinguishing it from sibling tools like sophos_list_users that list user accounts rather than sessions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit use cases: 'when monitoring live user logins, active session counts, or connected users.' Does not include when-not-to-use or alternatives, but the guidance is clear and helpful.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools