sophos_create_ip_host

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate the tool is not read-only (readOnlyHint=false) and not destructive (destructiveHint=false). The description adds that it creates an object but does not disclose behavioral details such as idempotency (per hint false), authentication requirements, or rate limits. The output schema is mentioned but not detailed. This is adequate but not exceptional.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is structured with a primary statement, usage guidance, and an Args/Returns section. It is front-loaded with the key purpose. However, the Args section somewhat redundantly repeats schema information, making it slightly less concise than optimal.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 6 parameters (1 required), high schema coverage (83%), and an output schema, the description covers all essential aspects. It explains when to use the tool, parameter details, and the return type. No critical information is missing for an AI agent to select and invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is high (83%), so baseline is 3. The description adds value by providing examples for parameters like subnet_mask ('e.g. 255.255.255.0' or '24') and explaining host_type options. This goes beyond the schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a new IP host object, listing specific types (IP, Network, IP Range, IP List). This distinguishes it from the sibling tool sophos_create_fqdn_host, which handles FQDN hosts. The verb 'create' and resource 'IP host' are precise.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description includes a usage line: 'Use when registering host IP or network subnet definitions for firewall policies.' This provides context, though it does not explicitly state when not to use it. Given siblings like sophos_create_fqdn_host, the differentiation is implied but not explicitly stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.