sophos_create_user

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are standard (readOnlyHint false, destructiveHint false). Description discloses the operation (create) but lacks details on side effects, error scenarios, or permissions. The return value is only vaguely described as 'API response status dictionary.' Could be more informative.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise and well-structured: one purpose sentence, then Args list, then Returns. No unnecessary words or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequately covers the create operation with required parameters and usage context. Given the presence of an output schema (not detailed in input), the return description is sufficient but generic. Could include more on group name format or potential errors.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 83%, so the schema already documents most parameters. The description's Args section adds minimal new info (e.g., default group, optional email) but is largely redundant with the schema. The 'client' parameter lacks description in both schema and description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states 'Create a new local user account on Sophos Firewall' with specific verb and resource. Distinguishes from sibling tools like sophos_list_users, sophos_delete_user, and sophos_get_user.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit when-to-use context: 'Use when registering new local user accounts for VPN or portal access.' Does not specify when not to use or list alternatives, but context is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.