sophos_list_ip_hosts

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotation readOnlyHint=true already indicates read-only behavior. The description adds no further behavioral details like pagination or limits, but does not contradict the annotation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise: three short sentences with clear front-loading of purpose, followed by usage and args sections. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simple listing purpose, read-only annotation, and optional filters, the description is adequate. It mentions return type (list or dict) and has an output schema. Minor omission: no mention of pagination or result limits, but not critical.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 50% (only name described). The description adds meaning for the client parameter as 'Optional SophosFirewallClient instance' and repeats the name filter, compensating for the missing schema description on client.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'List IP host objects defined on Sophos Firewall,' specifying the verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like sophos_get_ip_host and sophos_list_ip_host_groups by mentioning browsing of IP addresses, subnets, and ranges.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description says 'Use when browsing IP address, network subnet, or IP range objects,' providing clear context. It does not explicitly exclude cases nor name alternative tools, but the context is sufficient.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.