Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Sophos Firewall MCP Server

Sophos Firewall MCP Server

by jelmervdm
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

sophos_list_fqdn_hosts

Read-only

List FQDN host objects to inspect domain-based network hosts. Filter by name for specific results.

Instructions

List FQDN (Fully Qualified Domain Name) host objects.

Use when inspecting domain-based network host objects.

Args: name: Optional FQDN host name filter. client: Optional SophosFirewallClient instance.

Returns: List or dict of FQDN host objects.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "sophos_list_fqdn_hosts"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameNoOptional FQDN host object name filter.
clientNo

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.2.0

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description is consistent with the readOnlyHint annotation, indicating a read operation. It adds that the tool returns 'List or dict of FQDN host objects', providing useful behavioral context beyond the annotation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise: a clear one-line purpose, a usage sentence, and a structured Args/Returns section. No extraneous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple (list with optional filter), and the output schema exists. The description covers the main behavior, but lacks details on error handling or pagination. Still adequate for selection.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers 50% of parameters with descriptions. The description adds meaning for the 'client' parameter by specifying its type ('SophosFirewallClient instance'), but repeats the schema's filter description for 'name'. Overall minimal new information.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'List' and the resource 'FQDN (Fully Qualified Domain Name) host objects'. It also differentiates from siblings by specifying 'domain-based network host objects', contrasting with IP host tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description includes 'Use when inspecting domain-based network host objects', providing clear context. It does not explicitly state when not to use or list alternatives, but the purpose is well-defined.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools