getJsonSection_urls

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; the description carries full burden. It only states a read operation without disclosing response format, error behavior, or any side effects. The agent gets minimal insight into what to expect.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence with the key information front-loaded. It is not verbose, but the extreme brevity leaves out potentially useful context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter and many siblings, the description lacks context on output format, example usage, or how the section data is structured. It meets the minimum but leaves significant gaps for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is high (100%) and already documents the single 'hash' parameter. The description adds no new meaning beyond 'by hash,' so it provides no added value for parameter understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Get the 'urls' section of the MobSF JSON report by hash,' clearly specifying the verb, resource, and method. It distinguishes from 50+ sibling getJsonSection_* tools by naming the specific section.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus the many other getJsonSection_* tools. There are no notes on prerequisites, constraints, or alternatives, leaving the agent to infer from the section name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.