getJsonSection_min_sdk

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It only states what it does but does not disclose any behavioral traits such as side effects (likely none), authorization needs, or rate limits. For a read operation, the description is minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is front-loaded with the verb 'Get', followed by the resource and identifier. Every word is necessary and no unnecessary information is included.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate. It covers what the tool does and what input it takes, but lacks details on return format or behavior. Gaps exist in usage guidance and transparency.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides 100% coverage with a single 'hash' parameter and its description. The tool description does not add additional meaning or context beyond the schema, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states the action ('Get'), the specific resource ('min_sdk' section of MobSF JSON report), and the identifier ('by hash'). It clearly distinguishes this from siblings like getJsonSection_max_sdk or getJsonSection_app_name by naming the exact section.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus other getJsonSection_* tools. The description implies usage when the min_sdk is needed, but does not state when-not or provide alternatives. This is adequate for a simple getter but lacks differentiation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.