getJsonSection_malware_permissions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Describes read-only behavior of fetching a report section. No annotations exist, but description is clear and implies no side effects. Could mention error handling for invalid hash.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence with no superfluous words. Action, resource, and parameter clearly stated. Perfectly concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool is simple with one parameter and no output schema. Description explains core purpose adequately. Could benefit from noting that the section contains malware-related permissions, but overall sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers hash parameter with description. Description adds 'by hash' which mirrors schema. No additional details on format or constraints. Baseline 3 for 100% coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states verb 'Get', specific resource 'malware_permissions section', and input 'by hash'. Differentiates from many sibling getJsonSection_* tools by naming the exact section.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., other sections, getJsonReportSection). No prerequisites or context provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.