deleteScan
Remove mobile app security scan results using the scan hash.
Instructions
Delete scan results by hash.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| hash | Yes | Hash of the scan to delete |
Remove mobile app security scan results using the scan hash.
Delete scan results by hash.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| hash | Yes | Hash of the scan to delete |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It states the action is destructive but omits details on irreversibility, permissions, or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence with no unnecessary words, efficiently conveying the tool's purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a single-parameter tool, the description covers the basic action and input but lacks return value or error handling context, which is adequate but minimal.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and the parameter description explains 'Hash of the scan to delete', so the description adds no new meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states that the tool deletes scan results using a hash identifier, which is distinct from sibling tools like deleteSuppression and the many read-only tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for deleting scans by hash but provides no guidance on when not to use or alternatives like deleteSuppression for suppressions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/il-il1/MobSF-MCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server